Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Manuscript Submission for Brazilian Journal of Dentistry (BJDOR)

When submitting a manuscript to BJDOR, the authors must ensure that their work is original, unpublished, and not being considered elsewhere. The submission indicates that all co-authors have consented to the publication. BJDOR emphasizes that the accountability for the content lies with the authors, and the publisher will not bear legal responsibility for any compensation claims.

Online Submission

Authors should utilize the Submit manuscript hyperlink for uploading their manuscript files, following the on-screen instructions. Ensure that the manuscript is anonymized to facilitate blind review. Author details, including full names, affiliations, and ORCID iDs, must be provided separately during the submission process. BJDOR requires ORCID iDs for all authors to support research integrity and dissemination. The submission process involves confirming ORCID registration, including iDs in the form, and our system's verification for authenticity. Submissions lacking ORCID iDs will not proceed. BJD accepts manuscripts in English and Portuguese.

Authorship Guidelines

BJDOR adheres to the ICMJE guidelines for authorship, which require significant involvement in the work's creation, critical revision for intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published, and accountability for the work's integrity. Contributors who do not meet these criteria should be acknowledged separately. The clarification of each author's contribution is essential.

Research and Publication Ethics 

BJDOR maintains a dedicated section on its platform outlining the ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects. These guidelines are essential for ensuring the integrity and ethical conduct of the research published in our journal. Please see the ethical guidelines hyperlink.

Text Formatting

For BJDOR manuscript submissions, use Word in a 12-point Palatino font, applying italics for emphasis. Ensure automatic page numbering is active, avoid field functions, use tabs for indents, create tables with the table function, and save documents in doc. format (Word 2010 or higher). No standard format is required initially; formatting will be refined by BJD's copy editing team upon acceptance.

For all manuscript types submitted to the BJDOR, include the following sections: Title, Author list and affiliations, Corresponding author information, Research Ethics Committee Approval (if needed), an unstructured Abstract of up to 200 words, and Keywords. For keyword selection, it's recommended to use Health Sciences descriptors (DeCS) available at https://decs.bvsalud.org/. These elements should adhere to the specific article template provided by the journal.

Key-words: Maximum of 5 keywords (separated by semicolons) based on MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) from the National Library of Medicine.

All figures and tables must be included in the main manuscript.

Tables

All tables are to be numbered using Arabic numerals and should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order. For each table, please supply a table caption (title) explaining the components of the table.

Figures

All figures should have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi and must be inserted in the body of the text (in the template file). 

References

Reference citations in the text should be identified by numbers in square brackets (ie. [1]). The list of references should only include works that are cited in the text and that have been published or accepted for publication. The entries in the list should be numbered consecutively. If available, please always include DOIs as full DOI links in your reference list. All references must be inserted in the list in NLM format.

Authors must follow the following reference styles for their manuscript (do not use "et al."):

Journal article (without DOI): Costa MB, Farias IR, da Silva Monte C, Filho LIPF, de Paula Borges D, de Oliveira RTG, Ribeiro-Junior HL, Magalhães SMM, Pinheiro RF. Chromosomal abnormalities and dysregulated DNA repair gene expression in farmers exposed to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Feb;82:103564.

Journal article (with DOI): de Oliveira RTG, Cordeiro JVA, Vitoriano BF, de Lima Melo MM, Sampaio LR, de Paula Borges D, Magalhães SMM, Pinheiro RF. ERVs-TLR3-IRF axis is linked to myelodysplastic syndrome pathogenesis. Med Oncol. 2021 Feb 17;38(3):27. doi: 10.1007/s12032-021-01466-1.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc. should be placed in a separate section after the references section.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest must be disclosed in a distinct section following the acknowledgments. Guided by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, authors are advised not to engage in agreements with sponsors that could restrict their access to data or impede their ability to analyze, interpret, and independently publish their findings. Authors are required to declare any relationships or interests that might unduly influence their work.

Funding: All sources of funding of the study should be disclosed in a separate section after the conflict of interest section.

Plagiarism is expressly prohibited in BJDOR submissions. Plagiarism includes copying text, ideas, images, or data from another source, even from your own publications, without giving any credit to the original source. BJDOR reserves the right to hire a plagiarism check service if it identifies textual or data abnormalities in the manuscript submission.

The BJDOR recommends the use of statements, checklists and flowcharts for awareness of authors in relation to the development of your study (e.g., CARE,  CONSORT, STARD, STREGA, PRISMA, SQUIRE, COREQ, ENTREQ, CHEERS, and SAMPL).

More structural details of each article type are described in the sections below (last modified January 2022).

Articles types

Editorials

Editorials are usually published by Editor-in-Chef.

Original Research

Original Research articles present novel and unpublished studies conducted within the realms of dentistry. These articles serve as a platform for disseminating fresh empirical and experimental findings within the academic community. To ensure the quality and relevance of such articles, we provide the following updated guidelines:

  1. Abstract: Your abstract should be succinct, limited to a maximum of 300 words, and serve as a concise summary of your research, including its objectives, methods, key findings, and implications. Abstract headings are not required.

  2. Introduction: Within this section, furnish a comprehensive introduction to your research topic. Include a brief literature review that highlights pertinent prior studies, identifies gaps in existing knowledge, and articulates the research questions or hypotheses your study seeks to address.

  3. Materials and Methods: Clearly outline the materials, methods, and procedures employed in your research. This section should offer sufficient detail to facilitate replication of your study by other researchers. Include information on data collection, experimental design, statistical analyses, and any ethical considerations.

  4. Results: Present your research findings in a logical and organized manner. Utilize tables, figures, and other visual aids where appropriate to enhance result clarity. Ensure that all data are accurately represented and correctly labeled.

  5. Discussion and Conclusion: Analyze and interpret your results within the context of your research questions or hypotheses. Discuss the implications of your findings and how they contribute to the existing body of knowledge. Conclude your article by summarizing key takeaways and suggesting potential avenues for future research.

  6. References: List all sources referenced in your article using a standardized citation style (e.g., NLM). Ensure completeness and accuracy of citations.

Word Limit: Original Research articles should not exceed 3,000 words to maintain brevity and clarity.

Tables and Figures: While there are no strict limits on the number of tables, figures, or references, please use them judiciously to enhance research comprehensibility.

Author Limits: There are no restrictions on the number of authors for Original Research articles.

Publication Fee: Authors are required to pay a publication fee (APC) to cover the cost of peer review and publication.

By adhering to these enhanced guidelines, you can ensure that your Original Research article meets the highest standards of quality and contributes effectively to scholarly discourse within your field.

Clinical Case Reports

Clinical Case Reports serve as a platform for the comprehensive and informative presentation of unique or noteworthy dental cases. We strongly recommend that all Clinical Case Reports be accompanied by a review of the literature related to the case focus of the study. This literature review enhances the context and understanding of the reported dental case.

Clinical Case Reports should adhere to the following format:

Abstract: A concise abstract with a maximum of 300 words, summarizing the key aspects of the dental case and its relevance. Introduction: Provide an introduction with a brief literature review that highlights existing knowledge, similar cases, or relevant research in the field of dentistry. Emphasize the gap or uniqueness that your case report addresses.

Case Report Description: Present a comprehensive description of the dental case, including patient history, clinical findings, diagnostic procedures, treatment, and outcomes.

Discussion and Conclusion: Analyze and discuss the significance of the dental case, its clinical implications, and lessons learned. Conclude by summarizing the key takeaways.

References: List all sources cited in your case report and literature review using a standardized citation style (e.g., NLM).

Word Limit: Clinical Case Reports should not exceed 1,500 words. However, if the report is accompanied by a literature review, the combined word limit is extended to 3,000 words.

Tables, Figures, and References: There are no strict limits on the number of tables, figures, or references. Authors are encouraged to use these elements judiciously to enhance the clarity and relevance of their case reports.

Author Limits: There are no restrictions on the number of authors for Clinical Case Reports.

Literature Review: We strongly encourage authors to provide a review of the literature related to the case focus in dentistry. This literature review should offer insights into the broader context, existing research, and relevant studies related to the reported dental case.

By adhering to these updated guidelines, you can effectively contribute to the presentation and understanding of Clinical Case Reports within the field of dentistry, enriching the discourse with comprehensive literature reviews when applicable.

Clinical Images

The Clinical Images section welcomes submissions that exclusively focus on showcasing compelling and informative clinical images within the field of dentistry and oral radiology. We seek images that vividly depict relevant clinical scenarios, aiming to provide clear and insightful visual representations.

Structure: Clinical Images should emphasize the image itself and its associated description. There is no requirement for structuring the submission into sections; the focus remains on the clarity and informativeness of the image presented.

Word Limit: Submissions should not exceed 500 words. The text accompanying the image should be concise yet comprehensive, offering essential context and information to enhance understanding.

Figures and Tables: Each Clinical Images article may include one figure that vividly portrays the dental clinical scenario. Tables are not permitted in this article type, ensuring a clear emphasis on visual representation.

References: Up to 5 references may be included to provide background information and context for the clinical scenario presented in the image.

Author Limits: There are no restrictions on the number of authors for Clinical Images articles. Collaborative efforts are welcomed to enrich the discussion surrounding the clinical case.

Review and Evaluation: Submissions will undergo rigorous review for relevance, clarity, and the effectiveness of the image in conveying crucial clinical information. High-quality images with clear resolution are essential for consideration.

Ethical Considerations: Authors must adhere to ethical standards and patient privacy regulations. In cases where identifiable patient information is included, appropriate consent must be obtained.

Legends: Each Clinical Images should be accompanied by a descriptive caption that succinctly explains the clinical scenario or relevant details, enhancing the reader's understanding.

We encourage authors to adhere to these guidelines to contribute effectively to the dissemination of important clinical information. Through vivid and informative images, the Brazilian Journal of Dentistry and Oral Radiology aims to enhance understanding and advance the field of dentistry and oral radiology.

Review

The Review welcomes submissions within the domains of dentistry and oral education, providing a platform for various types of contributions:

  1. Epidemiological Reviews: These may encompass analyses of medical records, offering insights into health trends and patterns.

  2. Systematic Reviews and/or Meta-analyses: All systematic reviews must be registered in public databases like PROSPERO or OSF to ensure transparency and rigor. Authors must adhere to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines during the conduct and reporting phases.

  3. Integrative Reviews or Narrative Reviews: These reviews aim to offer a comprehensive overview of specific dentistry-related topics.

To uphold the quality and relevance of submissions to Review, we have updated our submission guidelines as follows:

  1. Abstract: Prepare a concise abstract with a maximum of 200 words, encapsulating the objectives, key findings, and implications of your review.

  2. Introduction: Provide an introduction offering context for your review. Include a brief literature review highlighting previous research in the field and identifying any gaps your review aims to address.

  3. Methodology: Describe the methodology employed in your review. Specify the type of review (e.g., systematic, integrative, narrative), outline the criteria and process for selecting manuscripts included in your review, and list the keywords used in your article search.

  4. Results: Present your review's findings logically and coherently. Utilize tables, figures, and other visuals when necessary to enhance result clarity.

  5. Discussion and Conclusion: Analyze and interpret your results within the context of your research objectives. Discuss the implications of your findings and their contribution to the existing body of knowledge. Conclude your article by summarizing key takeaways and suggesting potential avenues for future research.

  6. References: List all sources cited in your review using a standardized citation style (e.g., NLM).

Word Limit: To maintain brevity and clarity, submissions to Review should not exceed 3,000 words.

Tables and Figures: While there are no strict limits on the number of tables, figures, or references, please use them judiciously to enhance the comprehensibility of your review.

Author Limits: There are no restrictions on the number of authors for Review articles.

Adherence to these enhanced guidelines will ensure that your submission to Review meets the highest standards of quality and significantly contributes to the field of dentistry and oral education.

Mini-Review

Mini Review articles focus on specific aspects of current areas of investigation and their recent developments. These articles offer concise and clear summaries of particular topics, enabling readers to stay informed about new advancements and emerging concepts within the field of human health.

The format for Mini Review articles is as follows:

  1. Abstract: A brief summary of the key points covered in the Mini Review, with a maximum of 300 words.

  2. Introduction: An overview of the topic's relevance and its context within the field.

  3. Subsections: The content should be organized into relevant subsections addressing different aspects of the topic.

  4. Discussion: A summary of the key findings, along with discussions on their implications, controversies, research gaps, and potential future developments.

  5. Word Limit: Mini Review articles should not exceed 3,000 words, ensuring a comprehensive yet concise overview of the chosen topic.

  6. Figures/Tables: Up to 2 Figures or Tables can be included to enhance the presentation of data or concepts.

  7. Peer Review: Mini Review articles undergo a peer-review process to maintain quality and rigor in the presented information.

  8. Publication Fee: Authors are required to pay a publication fee (APC) to cover the cost of peer review and publication.

  9. Data and Citations: Mini Review articles should not include unpublished material (unpublished/original data, submitted manuscripts, or personal communications). Articles containing such content may be rejected or reclassified, leading to a significant delay in publication.

  10. References: List all sources cited in the Mini Review using a standardized citation style (e.g., NLM).

The introduction of the Mini Review section aims to provide a platform for succinct and insightful reviews of focused topics, contributing to the dissemination of knowledge and discussions within the field of interest.

Experience Reports

Experience Reports serve as a platform for sharing insightful experiences and reflections related to specific cases, educational practices, methodologies, or design concepts within the fields of health and biological sciences. To maintain the quality and relevance of Experience Reports, we have updated the submission guidelines as follows:

  1. Abstract: Craft a concise abstract with a maximum of 300 words summarizing the key aspects of your experience, including its context, objectives, key findings, and their implications.

  2. Introduction: Provide an introduction setting the context for your Experience Report. Include a brief literature review outlining relevant prior work or educational practices related to your case, methodology, or design idea. Highlight the gap or unique perspective your report addresses.

  3. Experience Report Description: Present a detailed and structured description of the experience or case you are reporting on. Provide a clear account of the context, objectives, methods employed, and the outcomes or observations made. Share insights, challenges encountered, and lessons learned during the experience.

  4. Discussion and Conclusion: Analyze and reflect upon the significance of your experience and its implications. Discuss key takeaways, innovations, or best practices drawn from your report. Summarize findings and conclude by emphasizing the broader relevance or potential impact of your experience on the fields of health and biological sciences.

  5. References: List all sources cited in your Experience Report using a standardized citation style (e.g., NLM).

Word Limit: Experience Reports should not exceed 1,500 words to maintain brevity and conciseness.

Tables and Figures: While there are no strict limits on the number of tables, figures, or references, use them judiciously to enhance clarity and relevance.

Author Limits: There are no restrictions on the number of authors for Experience Reports.

By following these improved guidelines, you can ensure that your Experience Report provides valuable insights and reflections, contributing effectively to the discourse within the fields of dentistry sciences.

Correspondence

The Correspondence section of the BJDOR offers a platform for succinct, thoughtful, and informed commentary on topics of clinical and public health relevance. This section is reserved for content unrelated to articles previously published in BJOR.

Scope and focus: We welcome letters addressing current issues in clinical practice, health policy, public health, medical education, bioethics, or scientific developments of general interest. Letters may also comment on articles published in other journals, provided they are of relevance to the BJDOR readership. Submissions related to content published in BJDOR will not be considered in this section and must be directed to the Comments section.

Content and structure: Letters should be concise, clearly written, and based on evidence or expert opinion. Submissions must include a title. A salutation is optional and not required.

Word limit: The text must not exceed 400 words, including references.

Figures and tables: One figure may be included, with an appropriate legend. Tables are not permitted.

Authors: A maximum of three authors is allowed per submission. Full names, institutional affiliations, and email addresses must be provided for each author.

References: Up to five references may be included. All references must follow the NLM (Vancouver) style.

Review process: Submissions will be evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief based on clarity, relevance, and adherence to these guidelines. This section is not subject to peer review.

Article Processing Charge (APC): Correspondence submissions are subject to a 50% discount on the journal’s standard APC. The final amount will be communicated to authors upon acceptance.

Letters to the Editor or Perspective

Letters to the Editor or Perspective serve as a platform for readers to engage in constructive discourse in response to articles published in the BJDOR in the last or penultimate edition. To ensure effective communication and adherence to our guidelines, we have updated the submission guidelines as follows:

  1. Content and Structure: Letters to the Editor are not structured, but they should start with a salutation, either "Dear Editor" or "Sir."

  2. Word Limit: Letters to the Editor should be concise, with a maximum word count of 500 words. This brevity ensures that your message is focused and to the point.

  3. Tables and Figures: Please refrain from including tables or figures in your Letters to the Editor. These should be text-based responses.

  4. Authors: Letters to the Editor allow for the inclusion of up to 2 authors who contributed to the letter's content. Clearly indicate the names and affiliations of all authors.

  5. References: You may include a maximum of 5 references in your Letter to the Editor. Cite relevant sources to support your points or provide context.

  6. Review Process: Letters to the Editor will be evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief for relevance, clarity, and adherence to journal guidelines. They will not undergo peer review but will be shown to the authors of the original article when deemed appropriate.

  7. Article Processing Charge: Letters to the Editor do not have an associated Article Processing Charge (APC).

By following these updated guidelines, you can effectively contribute to the scholarly discourse surrounding articles published in the BJDOR, fostering valuable discussions and insights in response to recent publications.

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Copyright Notice

When submitting the manuscript to the Brazilian Journal of Dentistry and Oral Radiology (BJDOR), the authors confirm to assign to the BJDOR the copyright in the manuscript and any tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript in all forms and media (whether now known or later developed), throughout the world, in all languages, for the full term of copyright, effective when the manuscript is accepted for publication.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  •  Licença Creative Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional License.
  • Authors assign copyright to the journal, including the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (cc-by), which allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
  • Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, to publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) after initial publication in the journal.